Template:Cite techreport: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Watcher [PHRhYmxlIGNsYXNzPSJ0d3BvcHVwIj48dHI+PHRkIGNsYXNzPSJ0d3BvcHVwLWVudHJ5dGl0bGUiPkdyb3Vwczo8L3RkPjx0ZD51c2VyPGJyIC8+YnVyZWF1Y3JhdDxiciAvPnN5c29wPGJyIC8+PC90ZD48L3RyPjwvdGFibGU+] (talk | contribs) m (1 revision: Importing template framework) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 15:29, 25 August 2011
{{{title}}}. Technical Report .
[edit] [ ] Template documentation
File:Ambox warning yellow.svg | This template employs intricate features of template syntax. You are encouraged to familiarise yourself with its setup and parser functions before editing the template. If your edit causes unexpected problems, please undo it quickly, as this template may appear on a large number of pages. Remember that you can conduct experiments, and should test all improvements, in either the general Template sandbox or your user space before changing anything here. |
Usage
Example:
{{cite techreport | first=M. | last=Ouyang | coauthors=N. Johnson | title=How good are branching rules in DPLL? | number=96-38 | institution=DIMACS | year=1996 }}
Produces:
Ouyang, M., N. Johnson (1996). How good are branching rules in DPLL?. Technical Report DIMACS 96-38.
See also
- Wikipedia:Cite sources: Style guide
- Wikipedia:Citation templates: Related templates
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikicite
- Category:Citation templates
The above documentation is transcluded from Template:Cite techreport/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories and interwikis to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |